Thursday, January 28, 2010

Review: Starman #81



STARMAN #81
WRITER: JAMES ROBINSON
LAYOUTS: FERNANDO DAGNINO
FINISHES: BILL SIENKIEWICZ
COLORIST: MATT HOLLINGSWORTH
COVER BY TONY HARRIS
DC COMICS $2.99




***WARNING: THIS REVIEW MAY (WILL) DISCUSS PLOT ELEMENTS OF THE STARMAN SERIES. BUT REALLY...SHOULDN'T YOU HAVE READ IT BY NOW?! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.***

"There was a city. A glorious and singular place."

With a line that echoes the opening of the very first issue, James Robinson returns to the series that he concluded nearly a decade ago...and it is great.

Opal City is normally a pretty quiet place. Street crime isn't really a problem these days, and though there is the occasional superhuman attack, Opal has always had protectors to keep her safe. Opal's usual champion is away when a fallen member of the city's most famous crime fighting family is corrupted by a black ring. Only The Shade stands in the way of the Black Lantern's murderous rampage.

Starman #81 was arguably the most anticipated "resurrected" title tying into DC's Blackest Night crossover. I was apprehensive when it was announced that James Robinson would be bringing Starman back for an issue. Not because I thought Robinson wouldn't be able to "go home again," but because the idea of bringing back my favorite comic of all time just to take part in a crossover didn't sit well with me. I'm happy to report that, while this issue is definitely zombie superhero heavy, there's quite a bit for long-time Starman fans to latch on to.

The issue begins with a revisit to the tragic death of David Knight, who was killed barely a week into his career as Starman. Robinson's choice to use David as the Black Lantern is a wise one, as the alternative (Ted) would have just seemed wrong. David was never the most likable character (not in life, at least), so seeing a twisted version of him as the villain of the story is satisfying, rather than upsetting. We quickly move to the Starman Museum, for a rundown on life in Opal City. On these pages, Robinson gives us a quick update on the Starman cast--Jack Knight is still happily retired, Bobo Bennetti and the O'Dare family are still fighting the good fight, and people still don't know what to make of The Shade. There's a strange sequence showing the zombie David stealing a cosmic rod. This rod is never seen again--David is shown shooting energy from his hands, but never the stolen weapon. Now that I'm thinking about it, why didn't he just use his Black Lantern ring to recreate his weapon like every other resurrected character? This small speed bump aside, the rest of the issue is outstanding.

As the issue progresses, even during the battle between Shade and David, Robinson reveals the fates of his Starman supporting cast--The Shade's relationship with Hope. Mason and Charity happily married with a baby on the way. The supporting cast was one of things that set Starman a cut above other comics, and Robinson lets us know that the characters have been living on since the series ended.

For me, Robinson's writing style is so tied to Opal City and the Starman family, that it sometimes seems out of place in other titles. Robinson is right at home here, and his style just feels right. The art, however, feels very, very wrong. I'm not fond of Fernando Dagnino as an artist. Bill Sienkiewicz is a fantastic artist, but his style can be...difficult at times. With Dagnino on layouts and Sienkiewicz on finishes, the artists team up with pretty decent results. The problem is that the art does not feel right for a Starman book. Though there were guest artists from time to time, Starman had a pretty consistent artistic style--Tony Harris and Peter Snejbjerg crafted the look of Opal City and her citizens for the length of the series. The art in Starman #81, while well executed, just feels...off. I know "it feels wrong" is an unusual critical response, but I think long time Starman fans will understand where I'm coming from, even if they don't agree.

I would have been happy without a new issue of Starman. The series ended so perfectly that I was content knowing that Jack Knight and his friends found their happy endings. This issue was the return to these characters that I didn't know I wanted. Robinson has hinted that he will be working on more Shade stories in the coming year and I welcome them. Though I had a couple of problems with the issue, after reading Starman #81, I'm glad that James Robinson has more Opal City stories to tell.

2 comments:

  1. Any time i can watch Dickie Swift go postal on a "filthy germ" who is hurting Opal City is worth it. That said i agree that the art was off. I almost felt like the tag-line should say Times Past or some such. Good review Joe.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I finally read the issue, so then I could read your review. Good ish and good review. I am a long-time Sienkiewicz fan (reading his work when he "got good" during Moon Knight, month-by-month) so his full art or inks are always welcome to my eyes. But Tony Harris pencils would have been nice, agreed. Now I'm going to re-read Starman #0, #1,000,000, and then dig out the Shade mini-series, which, oddly enough, I never read.

    ReplyDelete